The Ontario government is privatizing your public transit,
but there’s still time to stop them and Keep Transit Public!

How is this happening?

Discussions are underway between the City of Brampton and Metrolinx – the provincial transit planning organization – to expand transit in Brampton. This is great and we applaud them.

Currently, our public transit company – Brampton Transit – runs the ZÜM Bus Rapid Transit Line. We’d like to keep it that way.

Transit works best when it is publicly owned, operated and maintained. We’ve seen so many examples from around Canada and the world of what happens when private companies are left to run public transit. They try to squeeze profits any way they can by raising fares, reducing service and cutting corners on maintenance. Private transit has proven to be more costly and less safe.

So why bother privatizing at all?

Well, the incentive for governments is that they don’t have to pay for it all up front. By entering into a Private Public Partnership, they find ways to make transit profitable to private companies in exchange for footing the initial cost of building it. It makes the books look nicer, but as the Ontario Auditor General found in regards to the Watleroo LRT, borrowing the money from private sources ended up costing the province an extra $48m just to finance it.

In other Municipalities around the GTA, Like Mississauga and Hamilton, Metrolinx has sought almost exclusively to hire a consortia of companies to Finance, Design, Build, Operate and Maintain. (FDBOM).

Because public transit companies don’t Finance, Design or Build, they are ineligible to compete in the tendering process, and are out of the running to Operate and Maintain new transit. This effectively means that only large groups of private companies may even bid on the project. The current procurement process leaves the door open to all new transit in Ontario being entirely privatized.

However, IT’S NOT TOO LATE. If you take action now, we can pressure Metrolinx and the Provincial Liberal Government to make Brampton Transit the default operator and maintenance provider of any new transit projects that get built.

What you can do:

1. Sign the Petition
Signing the petition will automatically send emails to all MPPs and confirmed candidates in Brampton, as well as Metrolinx, the Ministry of Transportation, Infrastructure Ontario, and Premier Wynne’s office.

2. Contact your local constituents directly!

Riding Party Name Email
Brampton North Liberal Harder Malhi
Brampton North PC Rupidaman Dhillon
Brampton North NDP Kevin Yarde
Brampton East Liberal Paraminder Singh
Brampton East NDP Gurratan Singh
Brampton West Liberal Vic Dhillon
Brampton West PC Amarjot Singh Sardhu
Brampton West NDP Jagroop Singh
Brampton South Liberal Sukhwant Thethi
Brampton South PC Prabmeet Sarkaria
Brampton South NDP Paramjit Gill
Brampton Centre Liberal Safdar Hussain
Brampton Centre PC Harjit Jaswal
Brampton Centre NDP Sara Singh

Sign the Petition!

Keep Transit Publically owned and operated in Brampton

Dear honourable City Councillors, MPPs, and Madam Premier

**your signature**

448 signatures = 18% of goal

Share this with your friends:


Latest Signatures
448 Claudine Hunter Oct 07, 2019
447 Manvir Mann Mississauga , Ontario Mar 27, 2019
446 Saeed Hussein Etobicoke , Ontario Mar 27, 2019
445 Javed Nissar Brampton, Ontario Feb 22, 2019
444 Dibin Pokharel Brampton, Ontario Feb 22, 2019
443 Muzam Khan Brampton, ON Feb 22, 2019
442 Rashpal Basi Brampton , Ontario Oct 22, 2018
441 Gregory Barrett Brampton, Ontario Sep 01, 2018
440 ajay sampla brampton, ON Jul 13, 2018
439 Andre Monette Monetville, ON May 29, 2018
438 Douglas Carson Brampton, Ontario May 20, 2018
437 Rajni Singh Caledon May 09, 2018
436 Pauline Thornham Brampton, ON May 06, 2018
435 roger bharat bramalea, ontario May 04, 2018
434 PARMINDER GILL BRAMPTON, Ontario May 03, 2018
433 Marie Scannapiego Brampton, ON Apr 29, 2018
432 Paramjit Gill Brampton, Ontario Apr 26, 2018
431 Austin Pires Brampton, Ontario Apr 15, 2018
430 Andrew Paschalis Caledon, Ontario Apr 08, 2018
429 mike ali brampton Apr 07, 2018
428 Harvinder Singh Ghag Waterdown, Ontario Apr 07, 2018
427 George Dacosta Brampton, Ontario Apr 03, 2018
426 Syeda Z Brampton, ON Mar 20, 2018
425 Steadman Phinn Brampton, ON Mar 18, 2018
424 Razi Hasan Brampton , On Mar 15, 2018
423 Darwin Gumba Brampton, ON Mar 14, 2018
422 Rick Sansom Brampton, ON Mar 11, 2018
421 Dharwinder Singh Brampton, Ontario Mar 08, 2018
420 Raymond Mizzi Brampton, Ontario Mar 01, 2018
419 Stan Taylor brampton, Ontario Feb 27, 2018
418 Anusha Regmi Brampton , ONtario Feb 21, 2018
417 Sukhesh Panihar Brampton Feb 19, 2018
416 William Brown Brampton Feb 19, 2018
415 Kevin Knight Stayner, Ontario Feb 18, 2018
414 Gurpartap Singh Brampton , Ontario Feb 16, 2018
413 Kamal Rai Brampton, Ontario Feb 16, 2018
412 Shivam Mahajan Brampton, ON Feb 15, 2018
411 Hardip Singh Gill Mississauga , Ontario Feb 11, 2018
410 Navtej Duggal Brampton, Ontario Feb 10, 2018
409 George Disho Brampton Feb 08, 2018
408 Massimo Lavecchia Brampton, Ontario Feb 05, 2018
407 kuldip sembi brampton Feb 05, 2018
406 Pankaj Dewan Brampton, Ontario Jan 26, 2018
405 umeshkumar joshi BRAMPTON, ON Jan 21, 2018
404 Dinarte Frias Brampton, Ontario Jan 09, 2018
403 Jeevanjot Dhillon Brampton, ON Jan 06, 2018
402 Catherine Fenech Brampton, ON Jan 05, 2018
401 Maureen Holloway Port Hope, On Dec 30, 2017
400 Shawna St. Pierre Georgetown , ON Dec 30, 2017
399 Aisha Pennant Brampton , Ontario Dec 27, 2017

Quick Facts:
What you Need to Know


Kathleen Wynne’s provincial Liberal government is privatizing your public transit. If you don’t act now, all new transit in Ontario will be built with Public-Private Partnerships (P3s) with a private company operating and maintaining your transit.

We all know how the privatization of Hydro went. Higher rates and we’re still holding the bag with the debt. Let’s not make the same mistake again.

And we have transit-specific examples from across Canada and around the world. It's consistently a bad deal for riders, a bad deal for municipalities, and a bad deal for workers.


How did we get here? An ideology of selling public assets for short term gain, leaving the public with a legacy of pain.

Metrolinx, the provincial arm’s length transit planning organization, is only accepting bids from companies that can supply ALL components of the new transit builds.

The components of a bid are: Finance, Design, Build, Operate and Maintain. (FDBOM)

Because public transit companies don't Finance, Design or Build, they are ineligible to compete in the tendering process, and are out of the running to Operate and Maintain these projects. This effectively means that only large consortia of private companies may even bid on the project. The current procurement process leaves the door open to all new transit being entirely privatized.


Why have more than one transit operator in your city? That doesn’t make any sense.

Public infrastructure is big money. Privatizing transit infrastructure is a shell game, allowing governments to keep debt off the books, but taxpayers end up paying anyway. At a time of record low interest rates, no private company will be able to borrow at the same rates as the government and we will all have to pay those higher rates in our taxes and our transit fares for decades to come.

The proof is in the pudding. Take a look at the London Underground and British Rail privatization train wreck. The infrastructure was privatized and it was such a failure that the government had to bail them out and take it over again.


When Metrolinx builds a new transit project, they first release a Request for Qualifications, in which interested companies put their names in the hat. Metrolinx reviews these applicants for their qualifications and then releases a shortlist of companies that are allowed to bid.

Next, Metrolinx will put out a formal Request for Proposals to the shortlisted companies.

The issue is that any interested party has to commit to financing, designing, building, operating, and maintaining the project. Your local transit agency isn’t in much of a position to be able to finance, design or build such a project, but should be in the running to operate and maintain it. This is would be a step towards to keeping this new transit project publically owned and operated.

However, it’s not too late. Metrolinx's procurement policy is driven by privatization ideology fed down the chain from the provincial Liberal government. In many cases, it's not too late.

In Hamilton, our campaign drew over 6000 signatures to our petition, calling on Hamiton City Council to request that the local transit company, HSR, operate and maintain the new LRT line. Flooded with calls and emails, council votes 10-2 in favour of our motion!

It's never too late to demand quality public services.

Let’s keep our transit jobs local. Let’s keep transit owned by all of us and not by private companies.


How Metrolinx decides who gets to operate and maintain transit will affect everyone living in the GTHA and Niagara regions. If the public raises its voice demanding that transit operation and maintenance be publicly owned, it can happen. If awareness remains low, it’s possible that the Liberal government will award your transit to an international private company driven by a profit motive.


Transit privatization is happening all over Ontario with almost no awareness in the general public.

With your help, we can stop the privatization train wreck.

Campaign FAQ

Why is the operation and maintenance of new transit up for bidding?

The Provincial Liberal Government, through its transit agency, Metrolinx, has decided that it doesn’t want the people of Ontario to operate and maintain their new transit. Instead, it would rather ask big private companies to come in and run the core of your city's transit system. They hope that private companies from elsewhere will be able to understand the transit needs of your city better than the people who have operated transit there for decades and longer.

What is a Public-Private Partnership (P3)?

P3s come in many forms, but put simply, they are deals where the government signs a contract with a private company or consortium to build and operate a piece of infrastructure or a service on the government’s behalf. In exchange, the government promises them a healthy guaranteed profit over the decades to follow.

Why is our transit even being considered for privatization? Isn’t transit a public service?

The great promise of public-private partnerships is reduced risk, because the private partner promises to deliver the project for a fixed price and to pay penalties if they fall behind schedule. It sounds great in theory. In practice, when private projects’ costs increase, the private partners often simply walk away if they aren’t going to make any money on the deal anymore.

That’s exactly what happened with the London Underground P3. Then the public is left to clean up the mess. Likewise, even though they may promise to pay penalties if they’re late, when the time comes they will threaten to walk away from these deals and throw the project into chaos if the government forces them to actually pay them. These companies spend millions on lawyers who know exactly how to draw up a contract that’s “heads we win, tails you lose.” Look at the TTC, which is finding it impossible to cancel its contract for streetcars with Bombardier even though the deliveries are years late.


What has happened when transit has been privatized in other areas?

The British government decided to privatize its rail infrastructure and the result was a disaster. The privatized infrastructure company, Railtrack, cut back dramatically on maintenance to keep its profits flowing. The number of delays and accidents soared.

Eventually, the problems got so bad that they went bankrupt and the government was forced to renationalize the system. In London, the government signed a deal with two private consortia to modernize their subway, the historic London Underground.

The private companies promised a fantastic deal in their bids, but unsurprisingly they couldn’t keep their promises. As the companies realized that they weren’t going to make any money because they had under-bid and they experienced delays and cost overruns, they just walked away.

Once again, the public was left to pick up the pieces.

When everything goes great, private companies will still demand a healthy profit that comes out of taxpayers’ or riders’ pockets. When things go badly, the private companies walk away and leave the public holding the bag.

Does service improve?

Privatization does nothing to improve service. In fact, the private partner may have a strong incentive to cut back on service levels in order to increase its profits. Worse, if the city decides that it wants to improve transit service in the future, it could require renegotiating the contract. In that case, the private partner will no doubt demand a hefty subsidy.

Keeping transit public, by contrast, means that service levels are entirely up to the community and not a private company.

Does it result in better jobs?

Private transit operators consistently have higher worker turnover than public agencies. This means that workers can’t build up the skill and experience they acquire over a long career, making transit less efficient and less safe.

Is it safer?

When Britain privatized its rail infrastructure, its accident rates soared. Any private company is going to be tempted to cut back on maintenance to maintain its quarterly profits. It might not cause a problem in the short term but in the long term, it makes a transit system less safe.

Does it cost less?

In most cases, no. But even when it does, cost reductions always have to come from somewhere, whether it's skimping on maintenance, running trains less often, or paying workers less than a living wage. On top of that, private companies need to include their profits, which means an added cost that doesn't exist when transit is publicly operated. Companies often offer very low bids and promise the world to win a contract. But as soon as they run into trouble meeting their promises, they drop the contract and leave the public holding the bag.

The auditor general has said that paying a private consortium to borrow money rather than borrowing it directly has cost the Waterloo Region LRT, which is the prototype for others in the area, an extra $48 million.

You’re just a union worried about losing members, right?

We are transit workers because we believe in the service we provide to citizens. At the heart of it, we benefit when transit service is good for riders. When the frequency of trains gets cut, when safety is compromised, and when the transit agency can't retain its most experienced operators, riders suffer just as much as workers.

We are also concerned about protecting good, living-wage paying jobs in our city. When a private company comes in, they automatically try to cut wages and benefits in order to make a profit.

We believe that everyone in Ontario deserves the opportunity to earn a living wage and provide for their families.

What can I do to help?

Join the movement to Keep Transit Public!

In Hamilton, our campaign gathered over 6000 signatures for our petition. We flooded Hamilton City Councillors with emails and phone calls and the pressure worked. In August, Council passed a motion demanding that Hamilton's new LRT line be run by its existing transit company, the HSR.

The battle isn't over yet. Metrolinx and the province have yet to respond and are months late putting an RFP out.

It's clear we're having an impact.

Now we expand the fight to Toronto, Brampton, Mississauga, St. Catharines and the Niagara Region - all areas with Metrolinx transit projects in various states of progress.

Sign the petition, join us on social media, and join us out in the streets, talking to the public about why we should Keep Transit Public.